自然科学版
陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版)
旅游业高质量发展研究专题
非遗商品的旅游化开发利用指标体系建构与测量
PDF下载 ()
董宝玲1,2,白凯1*,杜涛1,王馨1
(1 陕西师范大学 地理科学与旅游学院,陕西 西安 710119;2 贵州师范大学 国际旅游文化学院,贵州 贵阳 550025)
白凯,男,教授,博士生导师,主要研究方向为社会文化地理与旅游者行为。E-mail:bkshaanxi@163.com
摘要:
使用层次分析法(analytic hierarchy process,AHP)建立了非遗商品旅游化开发利用评价指标体系,确定了指标体系各层次权重,实测了西安曲江大唐不夜城6类非遗商品的旅游化开发利用水平。结果显示:6类非遗商品的旅游化开发利用水平高,其开发利用水平分别为:民间绣活(86.04)、剪纸(85.80)、秦腔脸谱(85.49)、泥塑(84.23)、皮影(84.22)、戏宝盟(83.67);并以指标体系中24个主观问项为游客评价依据,利用重要性-满意度分析(importance-performance analysis,IPA)法划分了非遗旅游商品的重要性与满意度区间,分析了非遗旅游商品属性要素的优势与不足,提出了相应建议。
关键词:
非物质文化遗产;旅游化;指标体系;建构与测量
收稿日期:
2021-03-03
中图分类号:
F590
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4291(2021)06-0075-11
基金项目:
国家自然科学基金(42071186);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2018TS055)
Doi:
10.15983/j.cnki.jsnu.2021.04.020
Construction and measurement of evaluation index system for tourism development and utilization of intangible cultural heritage commodities
DONG Baoling1,2,BAI Kai1*,DU Tao1,WANG Xin1
(1 School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi′an 710119, Shaanxi,China;2 School of International Tourism and Culture, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025, Guizhou, China)
Abstract:
The tourism development of intangible cultural heritage commodities is a trend of activating and utilizing intangible cultural heritage and also means of reshaping locality, producing economic benefits and releasing social benefits. In this study, the AHP method was used to establish the evaluation index system of the tourism development as well as the utilization of intangible cultural heritage commodities and the weight of each level of the index system was also determined. The tourism development and utilization level of 6 types of intangible cultural heritage commodities in Xi′an Qujiang Great Tang All Day Mall were measured. The results showed that the tourism development and utilization level of 6 types of intangible cultural heritage commodities were high. The 6 types are folk embroidery, paper cutting, Qinqiang facial makeup, clay sculpture, shadow play and xibaomeng and their indexes are 86.04, 85.80, 85.49, 84.23, 84.22 and 83.67 respectively.Based on the 24 subjective questions in the index system, the IPA method was used to divide the importance and satisfaction interval of intangible cultural heritage tourism commodities. The model was also used to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of intangible cultural heritage tourism commodities and corresponding management suggestions were provided as well.
KeyWords:
intangible cultural heritage; tourism development; index system; construction and measurement