自然科学版
陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版)
后疫情时代中国旅游业恢复研究专题
后疫情时代中国典型省区旅游业恢复及预测——以琼、鄂、沪、京四地交通客运月数据为例
PDF下载 ()
孙根年*,甘晓蕊
(陕西师范大学 地理科学与旅游学院,陕西 西安 710119)
孙根年,男,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为旅游经济分析及危机管理。E-mail:gnsun@snnu.edu.cn
摘要:
新冠疫情的暴发给快速增长的旅游业带来巨大冲击,随着国内疫情形势好转,旅游恢复成为热点话题。为揭示不同疫情风险区旅游恢复进程,探索常态化疫情防控与旅游复苏的关系,提出疫情防控与旅游业恢复的4种博弈模型,并以公路、铁路、航空客运量为旅游人气的替代指标检验模型,最后结合Logistic增长曲线,预测不同案例地客运量恢复情况,并将其作为旅游人气推演旅游恢复。研究发现:(1)从节假日旅游恢复来看,“五一”假期旅游同比恢复率大致为20%~50%,“十一”国庆长假旅游恢复在70%左右,其中海南恢复最快,湖北最慢。(2)从短途旅游公路客运量来看,不同风险形势下各省区恢复曲线各异,最低风险的海南呈V型恢复,疫情“震中”的湖北呈U型恢复,疫情反复的北京、吉林呈W型恢复;长距离的铁路航空客运恢复受疫情波动影响小。(3)基于Logistic增长曲线,分别预测2020年8—12月与2021年4—8月客运量恢复情况,发现海南客运量恢复最快;各省市公路客运量恢复速度慢于铁路、航空。受“就地过年”倡议的影响,各省市2021年1—2月客运量显著下降,但后续恢复速度快于2020年。可见,客运量恢复受制于疫情防控政策,但政策对客运量的影响强度小于疫情。
关键词:
新冠肺炎疫情;旅游恢复进程;交通客运量指示;Logistic预测
收稿日期:
2020-12-21
中图分类号:
F592.99
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4291(2021)06-0009-12
基金项目:
国家社会科学基金(20BJY204)
Doi:
10.15983/j.cnki.jsnu.2021.04.014
Recovery and forecast of tourism in typical provinces of China in the post-epidemic era: taking the monthly traffic volume data of Hainan, Hubei,Shanghai and Beijing as an example
SUN Gennian*,GAN Xiaorui
(School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal university,Xi′an 710119, Shaanxi, China)
Abstract:
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a huge impact on the rapidly growing tourism industry and tourism recovery has became a hot topic because of the improved epidemic situation in China. To reveal the recovery process of tourism in different risk areas and explore the relationship between normalized epidemic prevention and recovery of tourism, four game models between epidemic prevention and tourism restoration were built and road, railway and air passenger volume were used as alternative indicators of tourism passenger flow to test the model. Finally the recovery of passenger volume in the case was predicted based on Logistic growth curve and was used as a "popular" indicator to deduce tourism recovery. The results show that: (1) According to the holiday tourism data, the year-on-year recovery rate in Labour Day holiday is about 20%-50% and about 70% in National Day holiday among which Hainan province recovers the fastest and Hubei the slowest.(2) Taking road passenger volume as an indicator for short-distance tourism, the recovery curves of different provinces are different under different risk situations. Hainan province, with the lowest risk, shows a V-shaped recovery;Hubei province, the epicenter of the epidemic, shows a U-shaped recovery; Beijing city and Jilin province, where the epidemic is repeated, show a W-shaped recovery. The recovery of long-distance railway and air passenger transport is less affected by the fluctuation of the epidemic.(3)According to the Logistic growth curve prediction, the passenger capacity of Hainan recovered the fastest. The recovery of railway and air passenger transport are slightly faster than that of road. Under the influence of "stay put" policy for the Spring Festival, the passenger capacity decreased from January to February in 2021 dramatically but the subsequent recovery rate was faster than that in 2020. It was indicated that epidemic control policy affects the recovery of passenger capacity.
KeyWords:
COVID-19; tourism recovery process; passenger volume indicators; Logistic prediction