自然科学版
陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版)
旅游助推乡村振兴专题
中国乡村旅游与农村经济耦合协调关系的实证研究
PDF下载 ()
高楠1*, 张新成2, 王琳艳1, 张旭红1
(1 山西财经大学 旅游管理学院,山西 太原 030031;2 西北大学 经济管理学院,陕西 西安 710127)
高楠,男,副教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为旅游目的地运营与管理。E-mail: gaonan0901@163.com
摘要:
采用物理学中的耦合理论和方法对中国乡村旅游与农村经济之间的关系进行研究,并依据耦合协调度等级标准将其划分为5个阶段:中度失调阶段、轻度失调阶段、濒临失调阶段、勉强协调阶段、初级协调阶段,在此基础上探索了两者耦合协调度的影响机制。结果表明:乡村旅游与农村经济发展之间存在着显著的耦合关系;1993—2016年,两者综合发展水平和耦合协调度均出现较大幅度提升,2013年实现了由失调阶段向协调阶段的转变;影响两者耦合协调度的因素由强至弱为农村居民人均可支配收入、农林牧渔业总产值、农村就业人员数、乡村旅游收入、乡村旅游接待总人次、乡村旅游基础设施投入、农村居民人均消费支出、乡村旅游景点数、农村固定资产投资完成额、乡村旅游人均花费、乡村旅游咨询服务中心数、第一产业占GDP比重。
关键词:
乡村旅游;农村经济;耦合协调度;影响机制
收稿日期:
2018-07-08
中图分类号:
F590
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4291(2018)06-0010-10
基金项目:
国家自然科学基金(41271157);国家社会科学基金(15BGL116);国家旅游局规划项目(15TABG019);山西省高等学校哲学社会科学项目(2014239)
Doi:
An empirical study on the coupling coordination relationship between rural tourism and rural economy in China
GAO Nan1*, ZHANG Xincheng2, WANG Linyan1 ,ZHANG Xuhong1
(1 College of Tourism Management, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics,Taiyuan 030031, Shanxi, China;2 College of Economic Management, Northwest University, Xi′an 710127, Shaanxi, China)
Abstract:
Based on the coupling theory and methods in physics, the relationship between rural tourism and rural economy in China is studied and it can be divided into five stages according to the level of coupling coordination degree, that is, moderate dislocation stage, mild dislocation stage, on the verge of dislocation stage, bare coordination stage, initial coordination stage. On this basis, the influence mechanism of the coupling degree between rural tourism and rural economy is explored. The results show that there is a significant coupling relationship between rural tourism and rural economy development. From 1993 to 2016, both the comprehensive development level and the coupling coordination degree have been greatly improved. In 2013, the transition from the dislocation phase to the coordination phase was realized. The factors affecting the coupling degree of the both sides from strong to weak are per capita disposable income of rural residents; total output value of the agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery; rural employment; rural tourism income; the total number of rural tourism receptions; rural tourism infrastructure investments; per capita consumption expenditure of rural residents; the number of rural tourist attractions; the completed number of fixed assets′ investments in rural areas; the per capita expenditure in rural tourism; the number of rural tourism consulting service centers; and the proportion of primary industry to GDP.
KeyWords:
rural tourism; rural economy; coupling degree of coordination; influence mechanism