自然科学版
陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版)
旅游经济研究专题
长江经济带文旅产业融合发展水平的时空演化及影响因素
PDF下载 ()
王兆峰*,梁志强
(湖南师范大学 旅游学院,湖南 长沙 410081)
王兆峰,男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事旅游地理、旅游管理等研究。Email:jdwzf@126.com
摘要:
推进文旅产业融合发展有利于提高国家软实力和满足人民日益增长的精神文化需求。运用耦合协调模型、旅游发展优先度模型及探索性空间数据分析,研判长江经济带11个省市2008—2022年文化产业和旅游产业融合水平的时空演化格局,并采用分位数回归探析耦合协调指数的影响因素。结果表明:1)2008—2022年长江经济带文旅产业发展水平均值表现出以2012年、2013年、2019年、2020年为节点划分的上升下降循环进行的5个阶段;空间上,文旅产业发展水平整体呈现东部>中部>西部的分布特征。2) 2008—2022年文旅产业协调度均值整体呈波动上升趋势;整体协调度等级较低,但等级结构在波动中渐进优化;协调度数值省际差异较大,高低值间的差距逐渐缩小。3)各省市文旅产业融合发展的空间聚类类型不一,HH集聚区主要为以沪、浙为代表的东部地区,其正向溢出效应明显不足;LL集聚区主要为以贵州为代表的西部地区,需进一步打破“马太效应”僵局。4)基础设施、人力资本、产业结构和科技创新均在不同分位点上对长江经济带文旅产业融合水平产生正向影响,而市场供给产生抑制效应,政策制度未通过显著性检验。
关键词:
文旅融合;时空演化;影响因素;长江经济带
收稿日期:
2022-12-17
中图分类号:
K902
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
16724291(2023)06009714
基金项目:
国家自然科学基金(41771162)
Doi:
10.15983/j.cnki.jsnu.2023133
Spatiotemporal evolution and influencing factors of the integration development level of culture and tourism industry in the Yangtze River Economic Belt
WANG Zhaofeng*, LIANG Zhiqiang
(College of Tourism, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, Hunan, China)
Abstract:
Promoting the integration of culture and tourism industries is conducive to enhancing a nations soft power and meeting the increasingly growing spiritual and cultural demands of its people. By utilizing coupled coordination models, priority models for tourism development, and exploratory spatial data analysis, this study assesses the spatiotemporal evolution patterns of the cultural and tourism industry integration level in 11 provinces and cities along the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2008 to 2022. Quantile regression is also employed to explore the influencing factors of the coupled coordination index. Findings indicate that:1)From 2008 to 2022, the average level of cultural and tourism industry development along the Yangtze River Economic Belt exhibited a cyclical pattern of rise and fall, divided into five phases with the years 2012, 2013, 2019, and 2020 as turning points. Spatially, the development level of the cultural and tourism industry generally followed the pattern of being higher in the eastern region, followed by the central region, and then the western region. 2)The mean value of the coordination degree of the culture and tourism industry from 2008 to 2022 showed an overall trend of fluctuating increase. Although the overall coordination level was relatively low, the level structure gradually improved over time. There were significant interprovincial differences in coordination values, with the gap between high and low values gradually narrowing. 3)Different provinces and cities exhibited various types of spatial clustering in the development of cultural and tourism industry integration. HH(highhigh) agglomeration areas were primarily represented by the eastern regions with Shanghai and Zhejiang as examples, but their positive spillover effects needed enhancement. LL(lowlow) agglomeration areas were mainly represented by western regions with Guizhou as an example, and breaking the “Matthew effect” stalemate is necessary. 4)Infrastructure, human capital, industrial structure, and technological innovation all had positive effects on the cultural and tourism industry integration level along the Yangtze River Economic Belt at different quantile points. However, market supply exerted inhibitory effects, and policy systems did not pass the significance test.
KeyWords:
cultural and tourism integration; spatialtemporal evolution; influencing factors; Yangtze River Economic Belt