自然科学版
陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版)
文化产业发展研究
中国文化产业主要行业空间集聚及其溢出效应
PDF下载 ()
马艳艳, 薛东前*,宋永永,弓颖,庞先峰
(陕西师范大学 地理科学与旅游学院, 陕西 西安 710119)
薛东前,男,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为城市与区域发展。E-maiil:xuedq@snnu.edu.cn
摘要:
采用泰勒指数(Theil index)、空间自相关和空间杜宾模型,分析中国31个省(市、自治区)2010—2019年文化产业空间集聚格局,揭示文化产业空间集聚的影响因素与溢出效应。结果表明:(1)从区域差异看,2010—2019年中国文化产业集聚水平差异主要来源于地区内差异,意味着东、中、西三大区域内部很有可能存在各自的核心省(市、自治区),形成“核心-外围”结构。(2)从空间分布看,文化产业的集聚水平稳定性达51.61%,其中艺术表演业的空间集聚水平稳定性最高,动漫业次之,娱乐业最低。(3)文化产业及各行业的空间溢出效应存在较大差异,其中娱乐业集聚的空间溢出效应最为显著,艺术表演业次之。(4)科技因素既能促进本省文化产业发展,也能带动相邻省(市、自治区)文化产业发展,特别是对动漫业而言尤为显著;人力资本对相邻省(市、自治区)娱乐业空间集聚的影响强于艺术表演业和动漫业;城镇居民生活水平对本省艺术表演的促进作用强于动漫业和娱乐业,对相邻省(市、自治区)艺术表演业的影响也强于上述其他行业。
关键词:
文化产业;空间集聚;溢出效应;传导机制
收稿日期:
2022-07-25
中图分类号:
G124
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4291(2023)02-0070-14
基金项目:
国家自然科学基金(41971204);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2021TS018)
Doi:
10.15983/j.cnki.jsnu.2023120
Spatial agglomeration and spillover effects of major industries in Chinas cultural industry
MA Yanyan, XUE Dongqian*,SONG Yongyong, GONG Ying, PANG Xianfeng
(School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xian 710119, Shaanxi, China)
Abstract:
Taking 31 provinces (municipalities and autonomous regions) in China as the research unit, Theil index, spatial autocorrelation and spatial Dubin model are used to study the spatial agglomeration pattern of cultural industry in 2010-2019, and to reveal the influencing factors and spillover effects of cultural industry spatial agglomeration. The results show that: (1) From the perspective of regional differences, the differences in the agglomeration level of Chinas cultural industries in 2010-2019 mainly come from intra-regional differences, which means that there are likely to be core provinces (municipalities and autonomous regions) within the three major regions in the east, middle, and west, forming a “core-periphery” structure.(2) From the perspective of spatial distribution, the stability of the agglomeration level of the cultural industry reaches 51.61%, of which the stability of the spatial agglomeration level of the art performance industry was the highest, followed by the animation industry, and the stability of the spatial agglomeration level of the entertainment industry was the lowest. (3) The spatial spillover effect of the cultural industry and various industries are quite different, among which the spatial spillover effect of the entertainment industry agglomeration is the most significant, followed by the art performance industry. (4) Scientific and technological factors can promote the development of cultural industry in the province, and also drive the development of cultural industries in neighboring provinces (municipalities and autonomous regions), especially for the animation industry; the influence of human capital on the spatial agglomeration of entertainment industry in neighboring provinces (municipalities and autonomous regions) is stronger than that of art performance industry and animation industry; the living standard of urban residents plays a stronger role in promoting the art performance of the province than other two industries, and a stronger effect on the art performance industry in neighboring provinces (municipalities and autonomous regions) than the other two industries.
KeyWords:
cultural industry; spatial agglomeration; spillover effect; transmission mechanism