哲学社会科学版
陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
文艺学研究
文学思维与科学思维的统一性——以“仙乡淹留”传说为例
PDF下载 ()
李 永 平
(陕西师范大学 文学院, 陕西 西安 710062)
李永平,男,陕西彬县人,文学博士,陕西师范大学文学院教授。
摘要:
世界范围内流传的与近代以来的科幻小说、电影相似的“仙乡淹留”传说的时空观念,和现代物理学相对论的时空观惊人的一致。作为人类共同的精神实践成果,文学的直觉思维和科学的逻辑思维有着内在的统一性。首先,虚构与否不是文学叙事和科学之间的区别,就累积性的文学叙事仙乡淹留传说而言,它反映了不同时代我们的理解框架的嬗变。其次,文学叙述的原始意象中有相当一部分是人类生命中所含有的遗传基因信息决定的,具有科学性,或者是科学事实的隐喻。再次,文学和科学受到同一思维模式的指引。最后,对文学与科学关系的认识,也许还需要突破现代性的二元知识框架,在人类学地方性知识传统中进一步深化。
关键词:
文学思维; 科学思维; 跨学科研究; 比较文学; 仙乡淹留; 故事范型
收稿日期:
2012-10-17
中图分类号:
I0-05
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4283(2013)02-0026-09
基金项目:
国家社会科学基金重点项目(12A2D090); 陕西师范大学中央高校专项资金资助项目(09SZZD03)
Doi:
Uniformity Between Literary Thinking and Scientific Thinking
LI Yongping
(College of Chinese Language and Literature, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710062, Shaanxi)
Abstract:
The idea of time and space expressed in the Legendary Story of “Stranding in the Fairy Land by Flood”, similar to worldpopular science fiction and movies, is astonishingly in conformity to that advocated in the theory of relativity of modern physics. Literary intuitive thinking and scientific logical thinking share internal uniformity as the results of human common spiritual practice. To begin with, literary narration and science don’t differ in fiction or nonfiction, so the legend as an accumulated literary narrative just described the changes of framework of our understanding in different times. Next, part of the original images in literary description was determined by the inherited genetic information of human life, which was scientific or metaphorical as scientific facts. Moreover, literature and science were both directed by the same mode of thinking. Finally, our understanding of the relationship between literature and science needs to be deepened in anthropological traditions of local knowledge by breaking the modernistic binary framework of human knowledge.
KeyWords:
literary thinking; scientific thinking; interdisciplinary study; comparative literature; “Stranding in the Fairy Land by Flood”; pattern of story