哲学社会科学版
陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
中国古代史研究
中国古代行政诉讼初探
PDF下载 ()
姬 亚 平
(西安交通大学 法学院, 陕西西安 710049)
姬亚平,男,陕西米脂人,西安交通大学法学院博士研究生,西北政法大学行政法学院教授。
摘要:
法学界主流观点认为古代是不存在行政诉讼的,但是,如果把“民告官”作为行政诉讼的基本特征来衡量的话,这种认识是不符合历史事实的。古代法律不仅允许“民告官”,而且方式多样。这种制度以儒家民本思想为基础,有利于人民的休养生息,能够防范官吏滥用权力,维护封建专制统治地位的稳定,客观上救济了百姓利益。当然,它与现代行政诉讼相比,还有多方面的区别。
关键词:
中国古代法律; 行政诉讼; 民告官; 直诉; 越诉; 监察
收稿日期:
2011-06-13
中图分类号:
D925; D929
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4283(2013)01-0132-05
基金项目:
Doi:
A Preliminary Exploration of Administrative Lawsuit in Ancient China
JI Yaping
(School of Law, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, Shaanxi)
Abstract:
A mainstream view held by the legal circle is that there was no executive lawsuit in ancient times. However, if we take the case of “civic accusations against officials” as the primary feature of executive lawsuit, the abovementioned perception doesn’t agree with historical facts. The ancient law not only allowed a citizen to launch a lawsuit against an official but provided varieties of accesses. Based on Confucian peopleoriented thought, this legal system paved the way for people’s rehabilitation and could prevent officials from abusing power so as to maintain the stability of feudal rule. However, objectively, the system did good to people’s interests. Anyway it differs from modern executive lawsuit in many ways.
KeyWords:
law in ancient China; executive lawsuit; civic accusations against officials; direct lawsuit; levelskipping lawsuit; supervision