哲学社会科学版
陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
哲学研究
毛奇龄“推移”说与清代汉易复兴
PDF下载 ()
林 忠 军
(山东大学 易学与中国古代哲学研究中心, 山东 济南 250100)
林忠军,男,山东莱阳人,山东大学易学与中国古代哲学研究中心教授,博士研究生导师。
摘要:
毛奇龄提出易有变易、交易、转易、对易、移易,演《易》系辞用移易,并证之以经文。他从《系辞传》“乾坤成列”、“刚柔相推”、“方以类聚物以群分”出发,整合了易学史上以卦变为核心的易象说,提出移易说,以此详细推演了六十四卦之间的关系。毛氏的移易说以全新的易学象数视域解读《周易》经文和《易传》,从中提炼和抽绎出“移易”、“聚卦”、“分卦”等概念,进而解构和重建六十四卦符号系统,以此探索卦与卦之间的内在联系,从而形成与以往卦变说不同的、以移易为核心的符号系统。他以移易之象和其他象解《易》,成为清初复兴汉易最重要的标志。同时,他运用考据的方法对于宋代图书之学进行全面的检讨和批判,开清初考据学之学风,对于清中后期乾嘉学派形成和汉易鼎盛产生重大的影响。
关键词:
毛奇龄; 《易》; 易学; 卦变; 移易; 汉易复兴
收稿日期:
2011-07-10
中图分类号:
B249.9
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4283(2012)02-0098-07
基金项目:
国家社会科学基金重点项目(11AZX004)
Doi:
Mao Qiling’s View of “Development” and Revival of Study of the Chinese Book of Changes in the Qing Dynasty
LIN Zhongjun
(Institution of Study of Book of Changes and Chinese Ancient Philosophy, Shandong University, Ji’nan 250100, Shandong)
Abstract:
Since change was synonymous to transformation, evolution, circulation, transaction and transition, Mao Qiling thought that it was by the sense of transition that we are to interpret The Book of Changes, which he expounded by quoting from The Book. Based on the ideas of “Heaven and Earth constitute a sequential order”, “The hard and the soft are interactive”, and “in the universe things classify and people group” in The Biography of Words of the Chinese Book of Changes, Mu introduced the view of transitional phenomena by synthesizing views of changing phenomena based on divinatory diagrams in the history of study of The Chinese Book of Changes, on the basis of which he reinterpreted the relationships of hexagram. From the view of transitional phenomena, Mu interpreted the text of The Chinese Book of Changes and The Biography of Words of the Chinese Book of Changes from a novel perspective of transitional divinatory diagrams and developed such concepts as “transition”, “synthesis of divinatory diagrams”, “analysis of divinatory diagrams” and so on. Furthermore he decomposed and reconstructed the symbolic system of hexagram to explore the internal relationships between divinatory diagrams, thus contributing a symbolic system on the basis of the view of transitional phenomena totally different from the former views of divinatory symbols. Mao Qiling interpreted The Chinese Book of Changes based on transitional and other relevant phenomena, whci was regarded as the most important sign of the revival of study of The Chinese Book of Changes in the Qing Dynasty.
KeyWords:
Mao Qiling; The Book of Changes; Study of The Book of Changes; variation of divinatory diagrams; transition; the revival of the study of The Chinese Book of Changes in the Qing Dynasty