哲学社会科学版
陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
学术前沿:
中国当代文学史写作范式的重建编年史体例与中国当代文学史编纂
PDF下载 ()
甘浩,张健
(北京师范大学 文学院, 北京 100875)
甘浩,男,河南信阳人,北京师范大学文学院博士研究生,副教授;张健,男,北京市人,北京师范大学文学院教授,博士生导师。
摘要:
传统中国当代文学史,往往以某种史观为主导,选择和汰除历史对象,建构出清晰流畅的文学史叙事。但是,这种当代文学史的客观、真实、可信品质日益受到怀疑。编年史体例不凸显史学主体在历史编纂中的宰制作用,不损害历史本体的客观性和丰富性,比较接近历史的原初状态,可以重建人们对历史的信任,因而在世纪之交成为一种应运而兴的文学史范型。同时,编年史体例注重辑录史料,推进了当代文学的史料学,有助于维护和巩固年轻的中国当代文学史学科。但是,传统的编年史琐碎散乱,缺乏历史叙事必要的系统性和整体性,需要吸纳众长,重建“现代版”的新中国当代文学编年史范式。
关键词:
中国当代文学史; 编年史体例; 文学史编纂
收稿日期:
2011-03-21
中图分类号:
I209
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4283(2011)05-0065-07
基金项目:
庆祝建国六十周年山东省重点图书出版项目(2009-01-01)
Doi:
Style of Chronicles and Compilation of a History of Contemporary Chinese Literature
GAN Hao, ZHANG Jian
(College of Chinese Language and Literature, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875)
Abstract:
Traditional history of contemporary Chinese literature developed its clear and smooth narration of literary history by selecting and rejecting historical objects according to a particular view of history. However, the objectivity, reality and believability of this sort of literary history meets with increasing doubt. The style of chronicles reestablishes a history closer to the original state and people’s trust in history without emphasizing the compiler’s function of personal choice or damaging the objectivity and affluence of the historical subject. Thus it rises in response to the proper time as the proper pattern of literary history at the turn of centuries. However, lacking in systematicness and integrity of historical narration, the traditional style of chronicles was trivial and scattered. Therefore, all other advantages should be adopted to reestablish a chronic pattern of “modern edition” of contemporary Chinese literature.
KeyWords:
Chinese history of contemporary literature; style of chronicles; compilation of a literary history