Abstract:
The 1930’s revolutionary literature was nurtured in the tension of economic interests, political demand and literary pursuit, so it was distinctively characterized with “capitalization”. The capitalized means of production made the 1930’s revolutionary literature assume especially complex and diverse features, and its production exposed to an ocean of paradoxes. As a result, the revolutionary literature, which should have resisted against capitalist modernity, had to actualize its own reproduction with the help of the former. This digested to a great degree its character of “revolution” and discounted its literary character.