哲学社会科学版
陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
哲学研究
超越“科玄论战”
PDF下载 ()
程 志 华
(河北大学 哲学系, 河北 保定 071002)
程志华,男,河北武强人,哲学博士,河北大学哲学系教授,博士生导师。
摘要:
发生在85年前的“科玄论战”是当时学术思想界的一件大事。之所以称之为一件大事,不仅在于其在学术界所掀起的波澜,其所揭示的问题成为学界之论争的焦点,而且这场论争也深刻地影响了20世纪中国哲学的走向。在“玄学派”与“科学派”的论争静寂下来之后,它的余声仍不断地“回响”于现代中国哲学界:熊十力在本体论的层面上,基于本体与现象之别对科学与哲学进行了界限的划定;牟宗三则更进一步,以探讨中西哲学的差别入手,由分析作为“心本体”之三个不同的“我”的关系,阐释了科学与哲学之辩证的诡谲关系。回顾对这一问题的探讨历程,可以显现中国哲学界在这一问题上由浅入深的轨迹。
关键词:
科玄论战; 科学; 玄学; 熊十力; 牟宗三
收稿日期:
2009-03-20
中图分类号:
B26
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4283(2009)05-0034-07
基金项目:
Doi:
Beyond the Dispute Between Science and Metaphysicsthe Dispute Between Science and Metaphysics
CHENG Zhihua
(Department of Philosophy, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, Hebei)
Abstract:
“The Dispute between Science and Metaphysics” 85 years ago was a significant event in the current academic world, which deeply influenced the orientation of Chinese philosophy in the 20th century. In that dispute, Xiong Shili ontologically delimited science and philosophy based on the discrimination between being and phenomenon. Furthermore, Mou Zongsan interpreted the treacherous association between science and philosophic dialectics by analyzing the relationship among the three different “selves” in “mental being” in terms of differences between Chinese and Western philosophy.
KeyWords:
dispute between science and metaphysics; science; metaphysics; Xiong Shili; Mou Zongsan