哲学社会科学版
陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
哲学研究
牟宗三对张载“太虚即气”的诠释
PDF下载 ()
邸 利 平
(陕西师范大学 政治经济学院, 陕西 西安 710062)
邸利平,男,内蒙古呼和浩特市人,陕西师范大学政治经济学院博士研究生。
摘要:
如何理解张载“太虚即气”命题的涵义,自北宋以来就聚讼不已。当代学者牟宗三相当独特地提出“太虚神体”一说,认为“太虚”不是指气,而是内在于气的超越性本体;由此而言的宇宙论不能定性为“唯气论”的自然哲学,而是在“道德的形上学”观照之下的“本体宇宙论”。牟宗三对“太虚即气”的诠释不仅提出了重新理解张载哲学性质的必要,同时也启发我们寻找解读传统智慧的别种可能。
关键词:
牟宗三; 张载; 太虚即气; 唯气论; 本体宇宙论
收稿日期:
2008-06-10
中图分类号:
B244.4
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4283(2009)03-0087-05
基金项目:
Doi:
Mou Zongsan’s Explication of Zhang Zai’s Proposition “The Great Void Refers to Air”
DI Liping
(College of Politics and Economics, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710062, Shaanxi)
Abstract:
Mou Zongsan, an eminent scholar in contemporary China, introduced a distinctive view to interpret Zhang Zai’s Proposition “The Great Void refers to air”, saying that “the Great Void is the existence of god”. With this position, Mou believes that “the Great Void” is not air but the supersubject which is internalized as air. Based on Mou’s view, cosmism cannot be defined as natural philosophy as was defined by the Qi theorist but as cosmism as the subject in terms of “moral metaphysics”. Mou’s interpretation not only proposes the necessity of reinvestigate the character of Zhang Zai’s philosophy but also seek some different possibility to interpret traditional intelligence.
KeyWords:
Mou Zongsan; Zhang Zai; “The Great Void refers to air”; theory of Qi; cosmism as the subject