哲学社会科学版
陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
周秦汉唐文化研究
《二年律令》与秦汉继承法
PDF下载 ()
曹 旅 宁
(陕西师范大学 历史文化学院, 陕西 西安 710062)
曹旅宁(1965—),男,湖南长沙市人,陕西师范大学历史文化学院博士后,华南师范大学法学院教授。
摘要:
根据《二年律令》的材料,秦代已有较完备的《置后律》。睡虎地秦简中的“后”字过去一直被理解为“后子”是片面的。“后”还有“继承人”之意。但《置后律》所规范的继承是一种身份继承即政治权利的继承,其次才是财产的继承。自江苏仪征胥浦101号汉墓出土先令券实物以后,学术界就有关中国古代是否存在遗嘱继承制度展开了讨论,其实,析产分家是古代财产继承的主要方式,《二年律令》中有“先令券书”的条文,可证“先令券书”只是家产析细见证而非遗嘱。
关键词:
《二年律令》; 《置后律》; 后子; 身份继承; 继承法
收稿日期:
2006-08-05
中图分类号:
D909-232
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4283(2008)01-0062-07
基金项目:
Doi:
The Two-year Decree and the Succession Statute of the Qin and the Han Dynasty
CAO Luning
(College of History and Civilization, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710062, Shaanxi)
Abstract:
According to the Two-year Decree, the Qin Dynasty had already laid out a relatively complete Young Successor Placement Decree. Thus it is a partial view to interpret the word “Hou (后)” on the bamboo slips unearthed in the Lying-tiger Land as “younger sons”. In fact, the word “Hou” also meant “successors”. However, what was stipulated first in the Two-year Decree was a succession of identity, that is, a succession of political right, and succession of property came only second. Since a substantial copy of the ancestor's bidding paper unearthed from the No. 101 Tomb of the Han Dynasty in Wupu of Jiangsu, the academic world had a discussion on whether China had a will succession system in ancient times. As a matter of fact, dividing up family and property was the main form of property succession in ancient times. It happened that the Two-year Decree contained the article of “the ancestor's bidding paper”, which proves that “the ancestor's bidding paper” was merely an evidence for dividing up family and property, but not a will.
KeyWords:
the Two-year Decree; Young Successor Placement Decree; younger son; identity succession; Succession Statute