哲学社会科学版
陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
中国哲学史研究
郭象认识论辨析
PDF下载 ()
康 中 乾
(陕西师范大学 政治经济学院, 陕西 西安 710062)
康中乾(1958—),男,陕西凤翔人,陕西师范大学政治经济学院教授,哲学博士,博士生导师。
摘要:
郭象的认识论历来被视为神秘主义的不可知论,原因在于他主张既忘其迹又忘其所以迹的“冥而忘迹”论。这样理解郭象的认识论当然是不对的,因为这只仅仅看到了其认识论思想的一个方面,而且对这一个方面作了表面的、片面的理解。考察郭象在《庄子注》中关于认识问题的论述,他的认识论思想有三个方面,“冥而忘迹”论只是其中之一。从郭象认识论思想这三个方面的统一来理解他的“冥而忘迹”说,它并不神秘,且这个“忘”的认识论与郭象的“独化于玄冥之境”的“独化”本体论有内在的一致性。郭象的“独化”本体论实质上并不是一种逻辑分析式的理论和方法,而是一种显现、现象性的境域,它需要的是象性思维。
关键词:
郭象; 唯言随物; 寄言出意; 冥而忘迹; 象思维
收稿日期:
2006-03-03
中图分类号:
B235-6
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4283(2006)03-0058-06
基金项目:
Doi:
A Discriminative Analysis of Guo Xiang’s Epistemology
KANG Zhongqian
(College of Politics and Economics, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710062, Shaanxi)
Abstract:
Guo Xiang’s epistemology is always regarded as a sort of mysticism and know-nothingism because he took an “ignorance-and-negligence” view. This understanding of Guo’s epistemology can’t hold water, for it resulted from viewing and superfluously and partially understanding only one aspect of his theory. In fact, Guo’s view of epistemology embodies three aspects, one of which is “ignorance-and-negligence”. If we see his view of “ignorance-and-negligence” in terms of an agreemenet of the three aspects, Guo’s view is by no means mysticism. Guo Xiang’s ontology of “individualization” is not a theory or methodology of logical analysis, but an overt and phenomenal realm, which calls for thinking in images.
KeyWords:
Guo Xiang; reference with object; symbol as indicator of meaning; ignorance-and-negligence; thinking in images