哲学社会科学版
陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
社会发展与治理研究
关于党内法规实施及其效果评估的几个问题
PDF下载 ()
朱 景 文
(中国人民大学 法学院, 北京 100872)
朱景文,男,北京人,中国人民大学法学院教授,博士研究生导师,中国法学会法治研究基地中国人民大学法治评估中心主任。
摘要:
对党内法规实施的量化评估,有助于考察我国党内法规实施的实际效果,从而为加强党内法规的实施、依规治党、从严治党提供助力。中国人民大学法治评估研究中心2015—2017年的调查数据显示,近年来我国党规与国法的协调性有了很大改善;党内法规实施的好评率也有明显提升;与办事人员和普通党员相比,领导干部带头的守法好评率提高幅度最大;人们对党内法规执行的满意度也有较大幅度的提升。但是,党内法规在实施中仍然存在着一些问题,如党规国法的协调性仍旧是党内法规体系中好评率评价较低的指标;党内法规实施的好评率上升幅度仍然小于党内法规制定的好评率;各种形式的党内法规监督之间的差距仍十分明显,党委监督和纪委监督强而党员监督和社会监督弱,等等。这些结论为我们下一步补足短板,全面加强党内法规建设提供了重要依据。
关键词:
党内法规; 党内法规建设; 党内法规实施; 党内监督; 量化评估; 治国理政
收稿日期:
2019-04-15
中图分类号:
D262.6
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4283(2019)04-0021-08
基金项目:
国家社会科学基金重大项目“法治评估及其在中国的推广应用研究”(12&ZD237)
Doi:
On Several Questions About the Implementation of Party Regulations and Its Quantitative Assessment
ZHU Jingwen
(Law School,Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872)
Abstract:
A quantitative assessment of the system of socialist rule of law with Chinese characteristics can help us to grasp the rule of law in China. The quantitative assessment of the implementation of the communist partys regulations helps to examine the actual effects of the implementation of the party's internal laws and regulations, thus providing assistance for strengthening the implementation of the party’s regulations, governing and administering of the party. The survey shows that although the coordination of the party law in China has been greatly improved in recent years, it is still lower than other indicators of the party's regulations. Although the favorable rate of the implementation of the party’s internal regulations has been significantly improved, its increase is still less than the favorable rate of the formulation of the party’s regulations. As for the form of the Party regulations implementation, compared with lawabiding personnel and ordinary party members, the leading cadres take the lead in complying with the law, and the satisfaction rate is the highest. At the same time, people’s satisfaction with the implementation of the party’s regulations has been enhanced greatly in recent years. The gap between the various forms of supervision of its implementation within the party is very obvious, and the favorable rate of supervision by the Party committee and the supervision of the Disciplinary Committee are obviously higher than the favorable rate of party members’ supervision and social supervision. These conclusions provide an important basis for us to sum up the shortcomings for the next step and comprehensively strengthen the party’s regulations.
KeyWords:
the CPC regulations; construction of the CPC regulations;implementation of the CPC regulations; supervision within the CPC; quantitative assessment; state governance