哲学社会科学版
陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
纪念恢复高考40周年
恢复高考招生以来专业选择的价值提升与制度变革
PDF下载 ()
吴 合 文
(陕西师范大学 教育学院, 陕西 西安 710062)
吴合文,男,湖北钟祥人,教育学博士,陕西师范大学教育学院副教授。
摘要:
恢复高考招生40年来,高等教育经历了从精英化到大众化的转型。在这一过程中,专业教育和专业价值逐渐得到提升,专业选择权成为社会关注的热点和高考招生改革的重要一环。专业选择合理赋权使个体和专业之间达到最佳匹配,对于促进科学选才、维持社会公平、提高人才培养质量都具有重要的意义。自主选拔录取、按学科大类招生、合并录取批次、专业平行投档等改革措施在一定程度上扩大了学生的专业选择,但是这些改革也存在覆盖群体有限、缺乏系统考量、公平观照不够等问题。当前制约学生专业选择的制度因素依然广泛存在。进一步扩大学生的专业选择需要采取确立高校招生主体地位、扩大高校专业信息公开范围、提供必要的专业选择指导、推动专业选择供给侧改革等措施。
关键词:
高等教育;高考招生制度;专业选择;制度变革
收稿日期:
2017-04-19
中图分类号:
G64; G424.74
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4283(2017)04-0027-08
基金项目:
国家自然科学基金青年项目“基于协同创新的高校内部治理变革研究”(71303144);中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2015M5825971)
Doi:
Value Enhancement and System Reform of Major Selection Since the Resumption of the College EntranceExamination and Enrollment System
WU Hewen
(School of Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710062, Shaanxi)
Abstract:
After the resumption of the college entrance examination and enrollment system in 1977, higher education has witnessed a period of transition from the elite to the masses. In this process, professional education and professional values have been gradually improved, and major selection has become the focus of social concern and an important part of the reform of enrollment system. Conferring reasonable rights to a major selection can achieve the best match between the individual and majority, select the talents scientifically, maintain social justice, and improve the quality of talents training. Some policies, such as independent recruitment, recruiting students according to discipline, merging the admission batches, parallel major enrollment pattern in a certain extent expand students’ major choices, but these policies also have problems, such as localization to a few groups, lack of systematic consideration and little consideration to fairness ect. At present, institutional factors which restrict students’ major choices still widely exist. To further expand students’ major choices, it is necessary to establish universities’ main status in enrollment, expand the public scope of university major information, provide necessary professional guidance, and drive the supplyside reform in major selection.
KeyWords:
higher education; the college entrance examination system; major selection; system reform