哲学社会科学版
陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
唐诗研究
论杜甫和白居易谏诤心态差异的文化模型
PDF下载 ()
傅 绍 良
(陕西师范大学 文学院, 陕西 西安 710119)
傅绍良,男,湖南澧县人,文学博士,陕西师范大学文学院教授,博士研究生导师。
摘要:
唐代设置了从八品至三品的谏官体系,谏官的制度化,一方面满足了文人谏政的政治愿望;另一方面又使得谏诤权力固化,削弱了文人谏政的政治使命感。这种现象在白居易的任职经历中表现得最为集中。与杜甫相比,杜甫虽然最高官职仅是八品拾遗,但却终身未忘谏诤本色。而白居易任拾遗只是其政治生涯中的短暂时光,谏职期间,敢杀身进谏。而不任谏职之后,则再无谏臣风采。杜甫和白居易代表了唐代谏臣的两大类型。杜甫是使命性谏官,而白居易则是职务性谏官。
关键词:
杜甫; 白居易; 拾遗; 谏诤心态
收稿日期:
2013-10-25
中图分类号:
I207.22
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4283(2015)01-0070-07
基金项目:
国家社会科学基金项目(10BZW040)
Doi:
On Different Cultural Modes in Du Fu’s and Bai Juyi’s Psychology as Imperial Censors
FU Shaoliang
(College of Chinese Language and Literature, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, Shaanxi)
Abstract:
The Tang Dynasty introduced a system of imperial censors from sub8th to 3rd grade. The systematization of imperial censors satisfied the scholar’s political expectation for advising the government on the one hand and on the other helped to stiffen the power of advice, weakening the scholar’s sense of political mission for advising the government. This phenomenon was well highlighted in Bai Juyi’s experience as imperial official. In contrast to Bai, Du Fu, whose highest rank was no more than an 8thgrade consultant, never neglected his duty as an imperial censor. Similarly, Bai Juyi used to be an assistant consultant, in which he dared to state his advice frankly despite the risk of his life. However, his position as an imperial censor didn’t last long, and he no longer put on the airs of an imperial censor. Through the comparison, Du and Bai represented the two main modes of government advising, Du as a missionary imperial censor but Bai as a functional censor.
KeyWords:
Du Fu; Bai Juyi; consultantship; psychology as an imperial censor