哲学社会科学版
陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
文艺学研究
刘勰的“赋比兴”论及其承前启后意义
PDF下载 ()
祁 志 祥
(上海政法学院 研究院, 上海201701)
祁志祥,男,江苏大丰人,文学博士,上海政法学院研究院教授,博士研究生导师,国学所所长,北京师范大学文艺学中心兼职研究员。
摘要:
“赋比兴”是《周礼·大师》中作为“六诗”、《毛诗序》中作为“《诗》有六义”提出来的。首先对“赋比兴”同时作出解释的是郑玄,其后是刘熙、挚虞,但释义多出,莫衷一是。刘勰在继承前人阐释成果的基础上,辨彰然否,将“赋”解释为直接的“体物写志”之法,将“比”解释为“比喻”,将“兴”解释为“起情”之法,并对“比”的本体与喻体的类别及“比兴”的异同作出了深入分析。刘勰此论奠定了后世“赋比兴”释义的基本走向,宋人李仲蒙将“赋”定义为“叙物以言情”,朱熹将“比”解释为“以彼物比此物”,将“兴”解释为“先言他物以引起所咏之词”,成为关于“赋比兴”的最权威、最合理的解释。
关键词:
刘勰; 赋比兴; 《文心雕龙》
收稿日期:
2013-09-17
中图分类号:
I206
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4283(2015)01-0052-06
基金项目:
Doi:
Liu Xie’s Theory of “Fu, Bi and Xing” and Its Historical and Realistic Significance
QI Zhixiang
(Institution of Jurisprudence, Shanghai Institute of Politics and Law, Shanghai 201701)
Abstract:
Liu Xie introduced “Fu, Bi and Xing” according to the “six styles of poetry” in The Master of the Rites of the Zhou Dynasty and the view of “The Book of Songs contains six types of meaning” in The Foreword to Mao Heng and Mao Chang’s Collections of Ancient Poems. Several scholars, such as Zheng Xuan, Liu Xu, and Zhi Yu, offered their own explanations about “Fu, Bi and Xing” but their explanations were varied and different. Based on the former interpretations, Liu Xie absorbed the advantages and deleted the disadvantages, interpreting “Fu” as a direct way of “describing things and expressing the mind”, “Bi” as “comparison” and “Xing” as the “way to emote the audience”. Moreover, he provided the classification of the tenor and vehicle in “Bi” and offered a deep analysis of similarity and difference between “Bi” and “Xing”. Liu Xie’s theory of “Fu, Bi and Xing” laid out the primary direction of interpreting these notions and has remained as the most authoritative and most reasonable up till now.
KeyWords:
Liu Xie; “Fu, Bi and Xing”; The Wen Xin Diao Long