哲学社会科学版
陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
学术评论与争鸣
重回逻辑的整体
PDF下载 ()
于 国 华
(吉林大学 文学院, 吉林 长春 130012)
于国华,男,吉林白山人,吉林大学文学院博士研究生,通化师范学院中文系副教授。
摘要:
袁济喜先生的《“说诗者,不以文害辞,不以辞害志”——〈古诗十九首〉主要作者为曹植说商兑》一文对木斋的相关研究提出质疑,否定曹植、甄后恋情,否定曹睿重编曹植文集时削除古诗的可能。然而,从历史典籍中看,对曹植、甄后受惩的记载存在矛盾,当时的社会与曹丕的行为也为植甄恋情产生提供了土壤;同时,曹睿对待曹植的态度表明曹睿编选曹植集存在着借删诗掩盖植甄恋情的动机。木斋通过全面细致的考证和逻辑的、整体的研究得出《古诗十九首》相关结论,在方法论上也具有独特性。
关键词:
曹植;《古诗十九首》;植甄之恋
收稿日期:
2014-05-05
中图分类号:
I207.22
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4283(2014)06-0039-09
基金项目:
Doi:
Return to the Holism of Logic
YU Guohua
(College of Chinese Language and Literature, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, Jilin)
Abstract:
In his paper “A Poetic Critic Cannot Distort the Author’s Intention with his Interpretation nor the Author’s Attitude with his Understanding—A Critical Discussion on the View of Cao Zhi as the Chief Author of The Nineteen Ancient Poems”, Mr. Yuan Jixi offered his doubt about Muzhai’s related studies, denying the love between Cao Zhi and Queen of Zhen and the possibility that Cao Rui deleted some of the ancient poems in his reedition of Cao Zhi’s writings. According to historical classics, however, there were contradictory records as regards Cao Zhi and Queen of Zhen’s punishment, and the atmosphere of current society and Cao Pi’s conduct created the greenhouse for the love between Zhi and Zhen. Moreover, Rui’s attitude to Zhi indicated that he had the motive of covering the love between Zhi and Zhen by deleting some of the poems in his reedition of Zhi’s collection of poems. Generally, Muzhai’s studies resulted from careful investigations and logical and wholesome analysis, by which he came to the related conclusions about The Nineteen Ancient Poems.
KeyWords:
Cao Zhi; The Nineteen Ancient Poems; the love between Cao Zhi and Queen of Zhen