哲学社会科学版
陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
经济学研究
中国经济学研究的失范与归真
PDF下载 ()
崔建军
(西安交通大学 经济与金融学院, 陕西 西安 710061)
崔建军,男,陕西乾县人,经济学博士,西安交通大学经济与金融学院教授,博士研究生导师。
摘要:
熊彼特提出了经济学研究科学程序的4个步骤观点,它可扩展为构建理论模型5个必不可少、次第推进的科学程序,即依据直觉发现有价值的经济现象(研究对象)、经济现象(研究对象)范畴化、经济范畴变量化、经济变量模型化和确定理论模型的约束条件。与熊彼特经济学研究科学程序的经典论述和构建理论模型的5个科学程序相对比,中国的经济学研究存在严重的失范现象,主要表现为“两个极端”即没有科学分析的对策热和没有经济学思想的数学模型滥用,“一个结果”即缺乏科学理论工具的积淀。中国经济学家要创造出令人信服的原创性研究成果,惟有端正学风,严格遵守经济学研究的科学程序和规范,回归经济学研究的本真。
关键词:
熊彼特; 经济学研究方法; 理论模型; 科学程序
收稿日期:
2014-03-20
中图分类号:
F12; F091.354
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4283(2014)04-0016-12
基金项目:
国家自然科学基金项目(71173165); 陕西省社会科学基金项目(10D024); 陕西省教育科学规划项目(SGH10008)
Doi:
Anomie and Return to the Original Nature of Chinese Studies of Economics: An Analysis Based on Schumpeter’s Scientific Program of Economic Studies
CUI Jianjun
(College of Economics and Banking, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, Shaanxi)
Abstract:
Schumpeter introduced the four steps of scientific program of economic studies, which were expanded into the five indispensable and evolutionary scientific programs of the mode of his construction theory: discovering valuable economic phenomenon instinctively, categorizing the phenomenon, quantifying the economic category, modeling the economic quantity, and determining the binding conditions for the economic model. Compared with Schumpeter’s classic discussion, serious anomies arose in Chinese economic studies, which presented themselves mainly in the “two extremes”: passionate offer of tactics without scientific analysis and abuse of mathematic models without economic thinking, and in the “one result”, that is, economic research results lacking in innovation. To create convincing authentic research results, Chinese economists will have to regularize their research style, strictly observe the scientific program and norm of economic research to return to the original nature of economic studies.
KeyWords:
Schumpeter; methods of economic studies; theoretical model; scientific program