哲学社会科学版
陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
教育学研究
老子与柏拉图道德教育思想比较研究
PDF下载 ()
王康宁, 于洪波
(山东师范大学教育学院, 山东济南 250014)
王康宁,女,山东临沂市人,山东师范大学教育学院博士研究生; 于洪波,男,山东烟台市人,山东师范大学教育学院教授,博士研究生导师。
摘要:
古希腊“三哲”之一柏拉图与中国传统哲学开山鼻祖老子在道德哲学上各有建树。前者从城邦的角度提出道德的来源,并借助神的力量成功地将城邦的德性移植到个体公民,进而制定出发展公民道德的教育蓝图、内涵与方略,最终培养出“内圣外王”式的道德楷模——“哲学王”。后者则以“道”的自然秉性为依据,将自然天赋的德性与个体应然的美德互为观照,以“道无为”为理论依托,指出了无为的“不言之教”对展开与完善道德的重要意义,最终亦成功地塑造出“自然而为”的道德典范——“圣人”。对二者道德哲学的比较研究,目的在于对“轴心时代”东西两大文明的道德源头予以学理上的探源溯流。
关键词:
柏拉图; 老子; 道德哲学; 比较研究
收稿日期:
2013-06-08
中图分类号:
B502.232; B223.1
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4283(2014)02-0042-08
基金项目:
全国教育科学“十一五”规划项目(BAA090010)
Doi:
A Comparison of Moral Education Idealogy Between Lao Zi and Plato
WANG Kangning, YU Hongbo
(College of Education, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, Shandong)
Abstract:
Plato, one of the greatest Greek philosophers, and Lao Zi, the founder of traditional Chinese philosophy, made their respective contributions to moral philosophy. Plato pointed out the origin of moral in terms of the citystate, successfully transplanted the virtue from citystate to individual citizen with the help of holy power, and established educational blueprint, content and strategy to develop civic morality to cultivate “the king of philosophy”, a moral example of “being saint and king”. Meanwhile, Lao Zi established individual obligatory virtue corresponding to natural hereditary virtue based on the natural character of “Tao”, continued with his theory of “nothingdoing Tao” to point out the significance of “nonspeaking education” to developing and completing morality, and finally successfully set up the sage, a moral example “following natural law”. Thus a comparison of their different moral philosophies aims to explore the theoretical origins of Oriental and Occidental civilizations.
KeyWords:
Plato; Lao Zi; moral philosophy; comparative study