哲学社会科学版
陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
美学研究
如何看待康德审美思想是一种“外离”?
PDF下载 ()
杨 泽 波
(复旦大学 哲学学院, 上海200433)
杨泽波,男,河北石家庄市人,哲学博士,复旦大学哲学学院教授,博士研究生导师。
摘要:
牟宗三在建构自己美学思想的过程中,对康德提出了严厉批评,认为其以目的论讲审美是一种“外离”的作法,有违于原先“内合”的路线。这种批评如果站在儒学立场上当然可行,因为儒家讲审美不需要讲什么目的性;但如果在康德学理系统中则不能这样说,因为康德如此讲是自成系统的。牟宗三批评康德是“外离”并不符合康德美学思想的基本理路,其对《判断力批判》理解的准确性有待讨论。
关键词:
牟宗三; 康德; 美学思想; 《判断力批判》
收稿日期:
2013-04-25
中图分类号:
B516.31; B83-Q
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4283(2014)02-0011-10
基金项目:
国家社会科学基金项目(04BZX033)
Doi:
How to Regard Kant’s Aesthetic Theory as a Kind of “Offcenterness”
YANG Zebo
(College of Philosophy, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433)
Abstract:
In constructing his own aesthetic theory, Mou Zongsan cruelly criticized kant, thinking kant’s discussion of beauty appreciation based on teleology was a means of offcenterness against the original line of “internal integrity”. This criticism of his certainly held water in terms of Confucianism, which discussed beauty appreciation without any initial purpose. In kant’s theoretical system, however, it didn’t for kant said so according to his selfestablished theoretical system. Therefore, Mou’s criticism of kant’s “offcenterness” didn’t conform to the theoretical basis of kant’s aesthetic theory. Further discussion is desirable about the accuracy of his understanding of Critique of Judgment.
KeyWords:
MOU Zongsan; Kant; aesthetic theory; Critique of Judgment