哲学社会科学版
陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
民族史理论研究
天下·国家·边疆民族
PDF下载 ()
程尼娜, 王万志
(吉林大学 文学院, 吉林 长春130012)
程尼娜,女,辽宁沈阳人,法学博士,吉林大学文学院中国史系教授,博士研究生导师;王万志,男,浙江台州人,历史学博士,吉林大学文学院中国史系讲师。
摘要:
秦汉以后,“天下”包括中国王朝与他国,不可因文化、族群与汉人不同,就简单地将王朝的边疆民族(内夷)与“天下”内的邻国(外夷)相等同。在传统国家形态下生活在边疆的各族群和政权,长期接受王朝的政治统辖,统辖形式有一个由羁縻制向直接统治变化的过程。中国各个历史时期建立政权和王朝的北方民族,都是长期受羁縻统辖的边疆民族,他们在推进边疆统辖机制转型的进程中,起到了至关重要的作用。关于“中国自古就是多民族国家”的认识基础是政治统辖,然后才是经济、文化等其他方面因素,切不可颠倒与混淆。
关键词:
“天下”; 传统国家形态; 羁縻制度; 边疆民族
收稿日期:
2015-02-27
中图分类号:
K28
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4283(2016)03-0040-07
基金项目:
教育部哲学社会科学重大课题攻关项目(10JZD0008)
Doi:
Border Nationalities in Terms of the Nations and Governments
CHENG Nina, WANG Wanzhi
(College of the Humanities, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, Jilin)
Abstract:
Since the Qin and Han Dynasties, the imperial dominion contained both the Chinese imperial domain and other countries. So it is not rational to regard the border ethnics within the dynasty as equivalent to the neighboring countries within the imperial dominion owing to their cultural and ethnical differences from the Chinese. Those ethnics and regimes living on the borders within the traditional form of state protractedly received the political governance of the dynasty, which went through a process from indirect to direct administration. Those northern nationalities who founded regimes and even dynasties in different periods of Chinese history had in long terms received indirect governance of the central dynasty and played a very important role in advancing the transformation of mechanism of borderland governance. Therefore, the belief that “China has been a multiethnic nation ever since ancient times” is first established based on political governance and then on other factors such as economy, culture and whatever, which allows no reversion or confusion.
KeyWords:
the “imperial dominion”; traditional state form; detaining system; border ethnics