哲学社会科学版
陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
中国古代史研究
东汉、宋、明三代无“和亲”说质疑
刘兴成, 薛平拴
(陕西师范大学历史文化学院, 陕西 西安 710062)
刘兴成,男,湖南桃源人,陕西师范大学历史文化学院博士研究生;薛平拴,男,陕西兴平人,陕西师范大学历史文化学院教授,博士研究生导师。
摘要:
关于东汉、宋、明三代有无“和亲”的问题,长期以来学界几近一致持否定态度,然而在《后汉书》《宋史》《明史》等文献中却有大量的“和亲”记载。以往学者之所以要否认这几个朝代的“和亲”史实,主要因为这几个朝代的“和亲”不含婚姻内容,不具有政治联姻的性质,与“和亲”即政治联姻这种“和亲”理论不符。其实,“和亲”的内涵比政治联姻广泛得多,“和亲”可以通过政治联姻来实现,但“和亲”并不必然是政治联姻,政治联姻只是实现“和亲”的诸多途径之一。故我们可以说东汉、宋、明三代无政治联姻,却不能说无“和亲”。
关键词:
东汉和亲; 宋代和亲; 明代和亲
收稿日期:
2012-05-20
中图分类号:
K234.2; K892.22
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4283(2013)04-0162-07
基金项目:
Doi:
An Inquiry into the View of There Being No Peacemaking Marriages in the East Han, the Song and the Ming Dynasty
LIU Xingcheng, XUE Pingshuan
(College of History and Civilization, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710062, Shaanxi)
Abstract:
Despite large quantities of records of “peacemaking marriages” in such works as The Book of Later Han, The History of the Song Dynasty, and The History of the Ming Dynasty, the academic circle has taken a nearly unanimous disapproval of whether there were peace-making marriages in the East Han, the Song, and the Ming Dynasty. The reasons of the former scholars’ disapproval of the historical fact of peacemaking marriages in these dynasties were that peacemaking marriages in the dynasties didn't agree with the theory that a peacemaking marriage means a political marriage because those peacemaking marriages didn't contain contents of marriage and were not of the nature of political marriage. As a matter if fact, peacemaking marriage has many more contents than political marriage, which is one of the many means to realize peacemaking marriage. To conclude, there were no political marriages in the East Han, the Song, and the Ming Dynasty, but there were peacemaking marriages.
KeyWords:
peacemaking marriage of the East Han Dynasty; peacemaking marriage of the Song Dynasty; peacemaking marriage of the Ming Dynasty